DISSECTING THE "VERDICT" IN THE "PIRONGRONG" CASE: WHY WAS THE SENTENCE GIVEN TO 2 YEARS IN PRISON WITHOUT PROBATION?

Dissecting the "verdict" in the "Pirongrong" case: Why was the sentence given to 2 years in prison without probation?

Dissecting the "verdict" in the "Pirongrong" case: Why was the sentence given to 2 years in prison without probation?

Blog Article

In addition, the verdict that mentioned the court’s use of the words that the defendant “led, pressured, manipulated” reflects that the NBTC subcommittee meeting during the period in question resulted in various controversies. Leading or pressuring may not mean an abuse of power because in the normal principles of meetings, the chairman (Ajarn Pirongrong) of the meeting has a duty to guide and influence the meeting. And if we look at the verdict, it is clear that there was no reasoning or evidence to indicate that any action was a manipulation.

credit : สล็อตเว็บตรง

 

Report this page